Tuesday, June 29, 2010

The Nuclear Hypocrisy Indeed!



The Nuclear Hypocrisy Indeed !.

Your edit, Clouds of Hypocrisy, (June 26) is an exercise in sophistry when you bracket India with Pakistan. India was forced to become a nuclear-state after China became one in 1964 and Pakistan started its clandestine nuclear club. India exploded a nuclear devise in 1974 for 'peaceful' purpose and later in 1998 to warn our two neighbours that India can defend itself. And one of the neighbour invaded India to "teach' a lesson for giving shelter to Dalai Lama, and the other neighbour threatened to eat grass but would have an atom bomb to confront India after its genocide in the East Pakistan which then became Bangladesh in 1971. One neighbour wants to encircle India with a string of military bases and the other wants to wage 'a thousand-year' war and with 'thousand cuts'.Can any country live in peace in this 'peaceful' neighbourhood ?

As far as the big five nuclear powers are concerned, less said the better. They have not taken measures to reduce the risk of nuclear war by announcing a time-table for complete and verifiable nuclear disarmament though USA and Russia have agreed to reduce their stockpile to a few thousands. All the five want to continue with their nuclear hegemony.

Additionally, USA had looked the other way when A.Q.Khan stole the nuclear technology from the Netherlands and started his factory with equipments from the European countries. We have the testimony of the former Prime Minister of the Netherlands to confirm this. Your own report ( The Power of Nightmares) in the issue states, " By any measure, Pakistan is a shocker. Its proliferation record would make the serial nuclear mischief-makers North Korea blush." Your report adds little later, " China has given Pakistan lots of nuclear and missile help in the past. It even passed it a tested design of one of its own missile-mountable warheads. This is one of the most damaging proliferation acts of the nuclear age, since the same design was later passed by Pakistan to Libya and possibly Iran and others."

Who are the nuclear saints and who are the nuclear sinners ? Let no sinner cast the first stone.

( A letter sent to Economist,London on its edit, Clouds of Hypocrisy, and a report, The power of nightmares, dated June 26,2010.)

June 28,2010.

******




Monday, June 28, 2010

Karmayog turns six years.



Karmayog is a unique platform for a common man - to get information, provide insight, get connected and thereby be a part of the public opinion, and also a creator of public opinion. Your initiative, the support of your colleagues and the participants, has made it a great success. Congratulations to you all.

I wonder whether you can sponsor discussion groups on various national issues. For example, Bhopal verdict has raised the important issues  - it is a failure of governance and the rule of law even after 34 years of republican rule. How to improve governance and the rule of law should be a topic of discussion. Is it just a failure of ruling politicians alone or the bureaucrats and the opposition are equally responsible ? It is the duty of the bureaucrats to give proper and legal advise to the politicians. Have they done it ? Why the bureaucrats bend and sometimes break the law than uphold the law, which is the mandate of the constitution.How to make them free from the clutches of the ruling politicians. Why the opposition did not come to the rescue of the victims of Bhopal ?

There are many other issues as well. A group of interested people can put forward the issue and people can respond and a consensus can be evolved. Even this suggestion could be debated.

( A response on karmayog turning six.)

June 27,2010.

*****  
 


Friday, June 25, 2010

Bhopal : Justice delayed,distorted and denied.

Bhopal : justice delayed, distorted and denied..

Bhopal gas (MIC, methyl isocyanate) leak happened 1984, 26 years ago. About three thousand died almost instantly and 15 more thousand had a slow death – delayed victims of the gas inhalation. Another 20 thousand suffered grievous injuries- mental trauma, physical disability - which crippled them for life. How the governments at the Centre and in Madhya Pradesh responded to this tragedy is a study in mis-governance or incompetence, may be worse, collusion.

Warren Anderson, the chief Union Carbide Corporation, which held 50.9 percent stake in the Indian subsidiary was fully responsible for the Bhopal factory, was given a safe passage. His company in USA did not take proper precaution even after a couple of workers died due to small leakage. His arrest was done by local police but his release was instant after the president of USA talked to the PM of India. He was flown in the state aircraft to Delhi and allowed to go out of Indian jurisdiction. The state/central governments reduced the gravity of the crime by making it crime of negligence rather than a crime of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Compensation amount was reduced from $ 3.3 billion to $ 470 million. After 26 years delay, the verdict comes out – eight accused, including one deceased, get two years jail and then all were granted bail. Victims still suffer and have received no justice.

This is not just a case of justice delayed but justice distorted and justice totally denied. Why Andersen was given safe passage? Why the gravity of the tragedy minimized? Why the compensation amount was reduced? Why the compensation amount was not distributed properly and in time ? Why the case was not conducted on a daily basis to expedite it? Why a special court was not constituted ? There are a number of culprits in this mis-carriage of justice and the chief among them are: Arjun Singh, the then chief minister of Madhya Pradesh and Rajiv Gandhi, the then prime minister of India.

As far as the crime itself, it is the Union Carbide Corporation of USA is fully responsible. Why all the gas was in a tank rather than in small cylinders as in the countries? Why the authorities were not given information about lethal gas and how it could be tackled if some leakage happened? Why it did not take the full responsibility for compensation and dispose of the gas and its residue still in the factory? Who is responsible for the pollution of water and soil of Bhopal surrounding the factory, and their remediation? Where is the corporate social responsibility?

Why the US government did not allow the Indian law to punish the US corporation and its top management? Why the US government is reluctant to extradite Anderson? The least it could do is to prevail upon Union Carbide to compensate the victims properly and take remedial measures to restore soil and water around the factory. President of USA has prevailed upon BP to bear the cost of oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico with a fund of $20 billion. He has do the same with Dow Chemicals which has taken over the Union Carbide. Will he provide the moral leadership to the world or simply ignore the moral question?

There has to be a proper investigation of the circumstances of the leakage and the delay in providing relief to the victims and punishing the perpetrators of the crime. This is a human rights issue as well.It is never too late. It is time India cleans up its act and the US provide all the assistance it requires.

June 24,2010.

****


Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Closing of the Western Mind : Jesus Christ Vs Church.


Closing of the Western Mind: Jesus Christ Vs Church...

" In a famous passage in Dostoyevsky's Brothers Karamazov, Jesus returns to earth, is recognized by the Grand Inquisitor and is thrown into prison for threatening to subvert the Church. His message of universal freedom had proved impossible to follow. As the Inquisitor taunts Jesus :

Did you forget that a tranquil mind and even death is dearer to man than a free choice in the knowledge of god and evil ? ...Instead of the strict ancient law, ( when you came) man had in future to decide for himself with a free heart what is good and what is evil...But did it never occur to you that he would at last reject and call in question even your image and your truth, if he were weighed down by so fearful a burden as freedom of choice?

You hoped, the Inquisitor tells Jesus, that people would worship you out of free will and without the need for miracles, but what they really yearn for is good order. Otherwise they tear themselves apart.

Freedom, a free mind and science will lead them into such a jungle and bring them face to face with such marvels and insoluble mysteries that some of them will destroy themselves, others will destroy one another, and the rest, weak and unhappy, will come crawling to our (the church's) feet and cry aloud: " Yes, you were right, you alone possessed his mystery and we come back to you – save us from ourselves."

The Church, the Inquisitor concludes, had through the use of "mystery, magic and authority", soothed the anxieties that Jesus had aroused. Hence the threat posed by his return.

"Mystery, magic and authority" are particularly relevant words in attempting to define Christianity as it had developed by the end of the fourth century."

This long quote sums up the attitude of Jesus Christ and the Church since its inception by Paul to this day, and it is from the book, "The Closing of the Western Mind, The Rise of Faith and the Fall of Reason" by Charles Freeman. Freeman is the author of three books Egypt, Greece and Rome ; The Greek Achievement and The Legacy of Ancient Egypt.  

Theology of sin and punishment.

Freeman highlights the role played by Paul in the evolution of Christianity. He formulated a meaning for Jesus' death and his resurrection. He also disconnected Christ from the Jewish Law ( Torah)  while Jesus had said that he had come to fulfill, not to destroy. Paul disassociated Christianity from the Greek intellectual achievements as well. "The more they ( non-Christians) called themselves philosophers," he tells the Romans, " …..they made nonsense out of logic and their empty minds were darkened." He tells Corinthians, "The wisdom of the world is foolishness to God." His views on idols, sexuality and Greek rationality which had not found a place in the teachings of Christ became a part of the Christian tradition.

Paul provided an institutional framework for the church – a comprehensible symbol (death and resurrection), proclaiming enormous rewards of Christian faith and the awful consequences of the rejection of "the cross of the Christ". No wonder many have called Paul the founder of Christianity. " It has always to be remembered ", says Freeman, "that Paul is the only major Christian theologian never to have read the Gospels, and one cannot be sure that he interpreted Jesus' teachings, on the Law, for instance, with accuracy."  

This break from the past led not merely to heresy but to violence in the later years. "During Paul's life-time Christians would have been unable to desecrate pagan temples without massive retaliation, but by the fourth century Paul's teachings, supported by Old Testament texts, were used to justify the wholesale destruction of pagan art and architecture", writes the author.

Augustine is the next important theologian who followed in the steps of Paul and gave powerful expression and coherence to the Christian theology. It is said that he integrated sinfulness into human nature – " the man who fused Christianity together with hatred of sex and pleasure into a systematic unity" as the German theologian Uta Ranke-Heinemann has put it. And the author adds that Augustine's gradual subjection of reason to faith and authority did much to undermine the classical tradition of rational thought. He accepted slavery claiming it to be God's punishment. His book, The City of God, became the foundation document of Christian political thought though it is radically different from that of the Gospels." Augustine's rationale for persecution was to be used to justify slaughter ( as of the Cathers or the native people of America)", comments the author.

It is hard to believe that Jesus Christ of the Sermon on the Mount would have agreed with the Christian theology of Paul and Augustine. The Sermon on the Mount is a message of peace, love and compassion while the theology of Paul and Augustine is that of sin and punishment, and only of faith and no reason.        

Greek & Roman Heritage.

Athenian democracy lasted for about 140 years and it was a brilliant political innovation in spite of the fact that it excluded women and slaves. It owes its origin and success to thinkers like Heraclitus who believed that there is an underlying order ( logos) and was sustained by continual tensions between different forces. The harmonious city, he observed, is not the one in which everyone lives in peace but one where citizens constantly engage themselves in activity and debate. The scientific thinking is based on the use of reason. The development of deductive proof was said to be the greatest of the Greek's intellectual achievement. This was used by the Greeks even before Aristotle systemized it. Greek had a galaxy of thinkers like Parmenides, Zeno, Socrates, Plato, Pythagoras and Hippocrates.

" The unexamined life is not worth living", said Socrates The observation of the shadow of the earth on the moon convinced the Greeks that it was a sphere. It is in the nature of man, said Aristotle, to be curious. Reason suggested to Aristotle that there is a supreme "unmoved mover" -  that which initiates motion. Plato believed that the soul was immortal and it passed from one body to another.

The Greek love for rule of law is expressed clearly in the play Antigone by Sophocles in the following verse :

" When he obeys the laws and honours justice, the city stands proud.

  But man swerves from side to side, and when the laws are broken,

  And set at naught, he is like a person without a city,

  Beyond human boundary, a horror, a pollution to be avoided."

However, the conflict between city states with limited resources and the internal political tensions led to the emergence of monarchy in Greece. King Philip II of Macedonia ruled a kingdom between Greece and the Balkans. After his assassination his son Alexander succeeded to the throne and he expanded the empire but he was not able to create a stable administration in his vast empire. By the third century BC, Rome became the centre of another empire and conquered Greek cities. Romans first adopted Greek rhetoric, and later Greek philosophy, science and mathematics as well. Rhetoric was extensively used in the election of magistrates in Rome. Marcus Tullius Cicero was one of the famous among them excelled in this art. Here again the republic gave way to monarchy. During the time of Augustus Caesar Rome adopted Greek culture in architecture and literature too. So much so, poet Horace said that Greece has taken " its captor Rome captive".  The fulfillment of public duties was an important part of being Roman as it was with the Greek.

What an individual believed about gods or myths surrounding the gods was a private matter. It became relevant only if someone publicly offended by disrupting a ritual or openly refusing to follow it.The Romans assumed that other people's gods were as important a part of the society as their own. "The Edict of Milan of 313, in which the emperor Constantine declared toleration of all cults including Christianity, marks the culmination of this process", observes the author.     

How Christianity becomes a state religion.

In his effort to improve administration, Emperor Diocletian declared in 212 that all subjects of the empire except slaves would be given the right to be the Roman citizens. He said that common citizenship meant accepting common responsibility for the state. This put all those who had questionable allegiances in a quandary, especially the Christians who resolutely rejected paganism and constituted an open defiance of the state. The rejection of paganism prevented the Christians to take part in public ceremonies or sacrifices.

The Christians were well-organized with a clear structure of authority ( the bishops), an evolving theology and  a 'saviour', Jesus Christ, a manifestation of God in human form. The author states, " They posed the classic political dilemma : how far can one show tolerance to a group that itself condemns the tolerance of the state in allowing pagan worship to continue ? " The Christians saw the pagan gods as demons and believed that pagans would suffer eternal punishment after death. This had resulted in persecution of Christians in the Roman empire by various authorities depending upon the local situation. Diocletian in his first Edict in 303 confiscated church property. Later, Constantine, in an effort to contain the constant menace to the state tried to absorb Christianity within the authoritarian structure of the state.

Once Constantine announced his "conversion", he brought Christians within the Roman community without alienating the pagans through the Edict of Milan in 313 proclaiming equality of all faiths. This is the first proclamation in European history which recognized the right to freedom of worship though it was just an affirmation of a right which was implicit in the Roman government, says the author. The emperor conferred some benefits to the Christian clergy such as exemption from the heavy burden of holding civic office and taxation to allow them to pursue their religious activities and to compensate them for the earlier persecution.

This exemption created its own problem for the emperor as Christian communities had diverse doctrines and quarreled with each other – one bishop with another, and even followers coming to blows. The main dispute was with regard to relationship between God the Father and Jesus Christ, the Son. Whether Jesus, the Son, is divine and part of the Godhead as some believed or whether Jesus had been created as "Son" thus distinct from a pre-existing God and subordinate to him as Father. There are passages which suggest that Jesus himself saw God as somehow distinct from himself. For example, "Why do you call me good ? No one is good but God alone" (Mark10:18). Then there is John's famous prologue, "And the Word was made flesh" which indicates Jesus was divine.

To stop doctrinal differences and unite all the factions, Constantine called a council of bishops to enforce an agreed definition of Christian doctrine under his auspices. The Nicene Creed of  325 decreed the doctrine of trinity – God the Father, the Son "begotten" from God the Father, and the Holy Spirit "proceeded" from God The Father. Constantine also passed a law in 326 to confer tax exemptions to the adherents of the Catholic (meaning, 'correct') faith and that heretics would not enjoy the privileges but would be subjected to various compulsory public services. Now, the "truth" was to be defined and enforced by law.

As a consequence of the Nicene Creed, the church became a part of the establishment. Constantine extended to the bishops the right of the magistrates to free slaves and hear civil cases if both the sides agreed. They were given the right to ban pagan funeral rites and enforce laws aimed at Jews, pagans and heretics. There was no appeal against their judgments. Property disputes, adultery, inheritance also became a part their duty.     

"Orthodoxy" was associated with tax exemption for the clergy and access to wealth and patronage. The clergy accepted slavery as a part of normal life and wealthy Christians owned slaves. Basilicas, as a symbol of heaven on earth, were decorated with gold and silver. Bishops became estate managers of their estates and properties. By the year 1086, a fifth of England's resources were under the control of the Church and the first Protestant Archbishop of Canterbury had seven major palaces for his personal use.   

Nicene Creed also allowed the church to take greater control over the interpretation of the scriptures."The effect, of course, was to make reasoned and open debate on theological matters increasingly difficult", author observes.  Another consequence was that some bishops became more confident and determined to assert church authority over the state.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

The combination of temporal power and spiritual (religious) power is fatal for rational thinking and new ideas. That is exactly what happened during the "dark ages" when the church enjoyed absolute power in Europe. It was Petrarch ( Francesco Petrarca, 1304-1374), the famous Italian scholar, who has been called 'the Father of Humanism' and 'the Father of Renaissance', named the middle ages as the " dark ages". This is the period between eclipse of Greek and Roman rational light (4th century) to the dawn of Renaissance (14th century). During this period there was a perceptible decline in the intellectual, cultural and economic decline. However, the present scholars avoid this phrase because of its negative connotation.

These centuries saw restrictions on art, books and science which were not Christian in nature. Greek scientific, philosophical and cultural works of thousands of years of pre-Christian civilization were called "devil authorship" and suppressed. Possession of classical works was enough to brand anybody as a witch and even could be burnt at the stake.Edward Gibbon, the author of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, mentions a story of a bishop Theophilus of Alexandria who allowed the celebrated library to be pillaged. In 1559, the Church prepared an Index of Forbidden Books or just 'Index' and its final edition appeared in1948. It was abolished only in1966. The 'Index' had a galaxy of writers and thinkers starting from Kelper, Galileo Galilee to Voltaire, Victor Hugo, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, Rene Descartes, Francis Bacon, John Milton, John Locke and even Jean Paul Satre and Simon de Beauvoir.

Since the Bible has mentioned four corners of the earth, it must be flat. The evidence that it is round and revolved around sun was suppressed. The only works of art during the 'dark ages' were scenes from the Bible. Even Christ was shown as having Nordic racial features – blond hair and blue eyes. There are many accounts of genocidal evangelism in Germany by Charlesmagne and the Teutonic Knights in the Baltic States. Without violence Christianity would not have been able to dislodge religious faiths and beliefs of the earlier age in Europe. And the violence was justified with reference to Old Testament exhortation to kill the enemies.

For about 300 years Inquisition was imposed on people who believed in paganism, who professed atheism, who falsely claimed Christian faith, and those who disputed Church's interpretation of the Bible. It was used against heretics, witches, bigamists and Jews. Imprisonment, torture and burning at the stake were the weapons sanctioned by Pope Innocent IV, Pope Gregory IX and  Pope Pius V.

Restoration of reason.

Intellectual self-confidence and curiosity, which lay at the heart of the Greek achievements were condemned as the sin of pride and the result was intellectual stagnation. Mathematics, science and other disciplines which depended on empirical observations did not make any progress. "The last recorded astronomical observation in the ancient Greek world was one by the Athenian philosopher Proclus in A.D.475, nearly 1,100 years after the prediction of eclipse by Thales in 585 B.C., which traditionally marks the beginning of Greek science. It would be over 1,000 years – with the publication of Copernicus' De revolutionibus in 1,543 – before these studies began to move forward again", says the author.

It was the Arab conquest of parts of Europe which recued the Greek and Roman heritage for posterity. A team of Arabic scholars translated writings of Aristotle, Plato, Hippocrates, Galen, Euclid, Ptolemy and others. These scholars believed that religion and philosophy reached the same truths by different routes and there is no conflict between them. They sustained the Greek tradition using empirical evidence and reason to carry forward knowledge of the world. Later, this belief in the compatibility of religion and reason seeped into Europe as well when Scholasticism emerged and the scholars prepared   an encyclopedia of what was known in the medieval world called, summae. And this was followed by the establishment of universities of Paris and Oxford. The works of Greek writers and their commentaries by Arab philosophers were translated into Latin. The re-discovery of Greek heritage of rationality and science led to the Renaissance and the Reformation which gave rise to the Enlightenment and the Scientific Revolution.

The author of book, Charles Freeman concludes the book with the following observations : " I would reiterate the central theme of this book : that the Greek intellectual tradition was suppressed rather than faded away. My own feeling is that this in an important moment in European cultural history which has for all too long been neglected. Whether the explanations put forward in this book for the suppression are accepted or not, the reasons for the extinction of serious mathematical and scientific thinking in Europe for thousand years surely deserve more attention than they have received."

Back to the teachings of Christ.

Jesus Christ has been rightly called the Prince of Peace. He proclaimed: Love thy neighbour like thyself; Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth;  Judge not, that ye be not judged; Do not do unto others what you wouldn't others do unto you ; Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's and unto God that are God's; Those who have not sinned throw the first stone. The Sermon on the Mount is a manifesto of a humanistic society, a kingdom of God, a Rama Rajjya. As the author of the book, Charles Freeman has pointed out these teachings do not find a reflection in the organized church. Paul established the organized the church on the foundation of unquestioned faith in a doctrine he fashioned. Later, it mixed up with temporal power – God and Caesar became one. This made it possible for the church to impose its faith on others. The organized church broke all the above and other teachings of Jesus. This distorted the development of church and Europe as well. The rationality which made science and democracy possible during the heydays of Greek thought had to wait for centuries to fructify. Art and science started blooming after the Renaissance. Democracy became possible only in the 20th century after the adult franchise was introduced in Europe and in the USA.

Christianity has to go back to the teachings of Jesus Christ to find the true values of life. The church built by Paul has decimated many cultures and many faiths. To say that there is only one way to reach God or there is only one Prophet of God is to limit HIS power, will and capacity. God, by definition, is omnipresent and omniscient and HE can reach all HIS creation any time and any where to suit the needs of HIS people. There are no chosen people as all are HIS people. There is no need to impose your faith on others. That would be imperialism. Diversity is a law of life and nature. Diversity makes the world as beautiful as a rainbow. That is HIS will. Reason is a precious gift of God to man to enhance his life and to realize his true divine self in his own way and fulfill his destiny. The church has to accept the diversity of faiths, cultures and beliefs. That would be a true tribute to Jesus Christ.

June 21,2010.

*****                            

 

       

 

                  


Monday, June 21, 2010

NGOs and the theory of change.



This is an important issue. What the NGOs are doing is commendable but it is a small effort which is possible for an individual or a group of individuals. Change of policy by the governments, local,state and central, has a wider impact on society. The NGOs have to change the mind-set of politicians/political parties who make the policies.

The right to information has made our democracy more transparent though one would have liked to have an open government - every decision taken by the government is on the internet and available for all citizens for scrutiny.

The decision of Madhya Pradesh government to give a lakh of rupees for every girl student when she graduates is changing the sex ratio in the state.

The decision taken during the time of late Shri Tinaikar to cement roads promoted better roads in Mumbai than before.

The decision of late Shri Ramachandran to provide mid-day meals to students has improved the attendance in schools and also improved the health of the children in Tamil Nadu.

I believe that NGOs can become the pioneers of social change when they think of the wider society and prod/persuade the political establishment to take action. Our rulers have to educated.

I also believe that NGOs should be 'the last-mile' link between the government and the people. Many government schemes are either not implemented properly and sometimes not even known to people to whom it was meant. This is a vast field where NGOs can work and this does not require a lot of funds but it requires only dedicated people.

A torch or a lamp can light up the darkness in a limited area but the sun can light up the world. NGOs have to expand their vision and reach. Social action has to expand to the political action.Political action is nothing but social action with a collective will.  

( A response to the query n NGOs and the theory of change by Karmayog.)

June 21,2010.

***.
      
  .